When traders talk about other prop firms being “affected” after FTMO’s rule changes, they generally mean that many firms have updated or clarified their own rules and policies in response to the broader shift FTMO helped catalyse in the industry. This 6 Best Prop Firms After FTMO-Style Rule Changes focuses on the best prop firms on clear prohibited-practice definitions, risk controls, and replication-focused funded criteria. Read on this 6 Best Prop Firms After FTMO-Style Rule Changes to know more about each firm.
- More explicit anti-abuse enforcement (latency and feed delay exploitation, prohibited arbitrage patterns, coordinated or mirrored trading, ultra-fast automation).
- Clearer news-event handling where evaluation may be more flexible, but funded-stage behavior around specific high-impact releases gets controlled (or profits are treated differently inside a time window).
- More product segmentation (example: FTMO rolling out a separate 1-Step vs 2-Step structure) so rules and objectives are tighter per program.
- “Replicable in real markets” framing where firms emphasize that evaluation performance should not depend on demo-only artifacts.
Why it matters: these changes influence which prop firms remain practical for strategies like scalping, news trading, automation, and high turnover intraday systems.
6 Best Prop Firms After FTMO-Style Rule Changes: Analytical comparison
| Firm | Best fit after rule tightening | News trading stance | Scalping and high-frequency stance | What to watch closely |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FundingPips | Traders wanting a mainstream challenge model with broad retail appeal | Check program-specific rules on their official legal pages | Typically fine for normal scalping if risk rules are respected | Rule clarity can live inside legal docs, not always summarized in one “policy” page |
| FundedNext | Traders who want explicitly documented rules and clear boundaries | Allowed, but a news reward-share rule applies on funded accounts within a defined window | Scalping allowed, but tick-level exploitation and multiple abusive tactics are restricted | Understand which profits are “counted” during the news window |
| The5ers | Traders aligned with “real trader” behavior and strict anti-abuse policy | Rules differ by program; anti-abuse focus is explicit | Strong prohibition language on high-frequency abusive behaviors | Less of a “scalper-first” marketing stance, more “discipline-first” |
| E8 Markets | Traders wanting broad retail prop exposure with strong program marketing | Varies by program; verify in their rules/terms | Strategy tolerance depends on compliance with their published rules | Always confirm policy in their own docs, not third-party summaries |
| Goat Funded Trader | Traders who value “allowed” headline behaviors with published constraints | News trading is allowed, but profits can be capped around high-impact events | Normal scalping can work, but prohibited practices apply | The specific profit cap rule around news can change trade design |
| FTMO (benchmark) | Traders who can operate cleanly inside strict anti-abuse and news constraints | Evaluation allows free trading; funded accounts have a restricted time window on targeted instruments | Strong anti-abuse framework and replicability requirement | Strategy must be robust without relying on demo-only quirks |
1. FundingPips: Mainstream FTMO Alternative
FundingPips positions itself as a large retail prop platform with multiple account structures and a broad audience, making it one of the most common “FTMO alternative” picks when traders want a familiar evaluation flow.
- Retail-scale infrastructure and program variety, which matters when firms start segmenting rules by product type.
- Compliance-first trading where edge cases (news windows, prohibited behaviors) are typically enforced via published policies rather than informal support answers.
Who it is best suited for
- Traders who want a mainstream prop structure and are comfortable reading legal/rule pages carefully before trading.
Also, you may read 10 Best Futures Prop Trading Firms
Strengths vs considerations
| Strengths | Considerations |
|---|---|
| Familiar retail prop format that fits many intraday systems | Rule nuance can be buried in legal pages, so “assume nothing” |
| Broad appeal as an FTMO-adjacent alternative | If your strategy is news-heavy or ultra-fast, you must validate exact policy wording |
2. FundedNext: Rule-Transparent Funding Platform
FundedNext is a retail prop firm with unusually detailed public documentation, making it easier to adapt after industry tightening because you can map strategy behavior to explicit rules.
- News trading allowed, but funded accounts apply a news reward share rule inside a defined time window.
- Scalping is allowed in principle, but tick-level exploitation and a wide set of abusive behaviors are restricted.
- Clear “restricted/prohibited strategies” coverage reduces ambiguity when enforcement tightens.
Who it is best suited for
- Scalpers who are not doing tick scalping.
- Traders who want rule clarity and can engineer around news-window profit treatment.
Also, you may read 10 Best Options Trading Prop Firms
Strengths vs considerations
| Strengths | Considerations |
|---|---|
| Very explicit rule documentation (good for systematic traders) | News-window profits may be partially counted on funded accounts |
| Scalping supported with clear boundaries | “Abusive behavior” list is extensive, so automation must be carefully designed |
3. The5ers: Discipline-First Trading Firm
The5ers is an established retail prop brand that emphasizes genuine trader behavior and explicitly targets abusive conduct across both evaluation and funded stages.
- Explicitly calls out arbitrage and high-frequency trading as prohibited practices.
- Framing: the program aims to identify real traders with repeatable systems rather than exploiting platform artifacts.
Who it is best suited for
- Traders with discretionary or rule-compliant systematic strategies that do not depend on ultra-fast execution or exploit-style patterns.
Also, you may read 10 Best Stock Trading Prop Firms
Strengths vs considerations
| Strengths | Considerations |
|---|---|
| Strong anti-abuse clarity across phases | Less “scalper-first” positioning, so you must match your style to their constraints |
| Good fit for disciplined intraday swing and structured trading | If you rely on very short holding times, confirm it will not be interpreted as HFT |
4. E8 Markets: Structured Retail Prop Platform
E8 Markets is a retail prop provider that promotes a funded challenge model and presents itself as a rules-driven simulated environment offering access to trading programs.
- Clear emphasis on a simulated market environment with published policies and program rules.
- Strong documentation habits across legal pages (useful when rule enforcement tightens).
Who it is best suited for
- Traders who want a mainstream prop structure and are comfortable validating all critical rules directly in official documentation.
Also, you may read 5 Best Prop Trading Firm Affiliate Programs Compared
Strengths vs considerations
| Strengths | Considerations |
|---|---|
| Structured product and legal documentation footprint | Always verify strategy allowances in official docs, since “allowed” depends on program terms |
| Works well when you want clarity on what is enforceable | If your approach is news-heavy or ultra-fast, confirm exact restrictions first |
5. Goat Funded Trader: News-Flexible Funding Model
Goat Funded Trader is a retail prop platform that publicly highlights “news trading allowed,” while still applying rule-based constraints to prevent abuse.
- News trading is allowed, but they disclose a profit cap rule for trades opened/closed within 5 minutes of high-impact news.
- Product table presentation includes leverage, profit split, and no-time-limit positioning (useful for traders sensitive to time constraints).
- Prohibited practice coverage exists in their help system.
Who it is best suited for
- Traders who want explicit allowance for news trading, but can trade within profit caps and risk rules.
Also, you may read 10 Prop Trading Firms Australia
Strengths vs considerations
| Strengths | Considerations |
|---|---|
| News trading explicitly allowed | Profit cap around high-impact news can invalidate news-spike strategies |
| Strong product clarity on key commercial terms | You still need to avoid prohibited practices like martingale-style risk patterns |
6. FTMO: Leading Global Prop Firm
FTMO remains the benchmark most firms resemble when the industry tightens rules, because it publishes detailed guidance on what it considers non-replicable or abusive.
- Forbidden practices include exploiting pricing delays or errors, coordinated manipulation between accounts, ultra-fast tooling, and other non-replicable behaviors.
- News trading: evaluation phases allow trading during macro news, but funded accounts apply a restricted time window on targeted instruments (with an exception for specific swing account context).
- Program segmentation: FTMO now provides a 1-Step product that differs structurally from 2-Step.
Who it is best suited for
- Traders who can generate returns without relying on latency edges, exploit patterns, or restricted-window news execution.
Also, you may read 4 Best Forex Prop Firms for Scalping
Strengths vs considerations
| Strengths | Considerations |
|---|---|
| Extremely clear anti-abuse stance and public guidance | Funded-stage news window restrictions can affect certain intraday styles |
| Product segmentation helps you choose a structure aligned with your trading | Your system must be replicable in real market conditions, not demo-dependent |
6 Best Prop Firms After FTMO-Style Rule Changes: What Each Prop Firm Brings
| Prop Firm | Core Value Proposition | What It Brings to Traders |
|---|---|---|
| FTMO | Industry Benchmark Model | A highly structured evaluation framework with strong rule clarity, realistic simulated trading conditions, and a clear path from evaluation to funded accounts. |
| FundedNext | Flexible, Reward-Driven Funding | Multiple funding paths with flexible evaluation structures and strong performance-based reward potential, designed for diverse trading styles. |
| The5%ers | Long-Term Trader Growth | A career-oriented funding model focused on disciplined trading, gradual scaling, and sustainable capital growth rather than short-term challenge wins. |
| E8 Markets | Structured Retail Access | Clear evaluation programs with defined rules, scalable capital options, and a straightforward challenge-to-funded progression. |
| Goat Funded Trader | Trader-Freedom Focus | Flexible trading conditions, broad strategy allowance within risk rules, and scaling options that appeal to active retail traders. |
| FundingPips | Mainstream Retail Evaluation | A familiar, challenge-based prop trading model designed for accessibility, simplicity, and wide retail participation. |
6 Best Prop Firms After FTMO-Style Rule Changes: Final verdict
- If you want maximum rule clarity and documentation depth, FundedNext stands out because key constraints (news-window profit treatment, tick scalping restrictions, prohibited strategies) are clearly spelled out.
- If you want a news-permitted posture but can work with a profit cap around high-impact events, Goat Funded Trader is structurally different from FTMO’s restricted-window model.
- If you want a discipline-first prop environment that explicitly attacks abuse patterns, The5%ers is strong, but you should not treat it as “anything goes” for ultra-short HFT-like behavior.
- E8 Markets and FundingPips remain common FTMO alternatives, but your success depends on reading and matching the exact rule language for your chosen program type.
- FTMO stays the baseline for traders who can thrive under tight enforcement and structured news constraints.
Also, you may read Blueberry Futures vs Take Profit Trader vs Apex Trader Funding
Conclusion
FTMO-style tightening pushes the prop market toward one core idea: performance must come from repeatable market skill, not from exploiting execution quirks, news timing loopholes, or hyper-fast automation. The “best” alternative is therefore not the one with the loudest marketing, but the one whose published rules align cleanly with your strategy’s mechanics, especially around news windows, scalping velocity, and prohibited behavior definitions.
Frequently Asked Questions
If a firm says “scalping allowed,” is tick scalping included?
Usually not. Many firms distinguish normal scalping from tick-level exploitation and classify the latter as abusive.
Why do firms apply special rules around high-impact news?
They apply special rules because spreads, slippage, and liquidity distortions can create edge cases that do not reflect normal execution, and firms manage that risk with windows or profit-treatment rules.
Which of these firms is most transparent about restrictions?
FundedNext publishes very explicit help-center guidance for key issues like news trading and prohibited strategies.
What is the fastest way to avoid disqualification risk?
Trade a strategy that does not rely on latency, arbitrage glitches, or concentrated news-window execution, and confirm the firm’s exact wording before trading.
